Socratic Seminar Preparation Sheet #4
Summary
Within "Book Three" of 1984, Winston is taken by the though-police and tortured until he ultimately betrays his love, Julia. This then shows the police that he is now a full party member, and when he is released he lives his life only caring about the appreciation of Big Brother.
Level 2 Questions
1.Why does Winston start to love O’Brien even though O’Brien is the person that is torturing Winston?
Winston starts to love O’Brien because the pain that O’Brien inflicts on Winston is affecting Winston’s mind. O’Brien has power over Winston so when O’Brien lessens the torture it makes Winston love O’Brien for not inflicting as much pain on him. This plays to the reader’s emotions because how in the world could Winston love a person who is causing him to suffer, in answering this question I employed a PATHOS appeal, by the way I answer the question using emotion.
2. How might the Party have known of Winston's fear of rats?
I believe that it was when Julia betrays, Winston that she tells the thought police of his fear, in order to begin to control him, and torture him into becoming a full party member. In answering this question I employed both a LOGOS and PATHOS appeal, since I contrasted emotion and logic.
3. Based on what Obrien states to Winston, when he asks if Big Brother is alive, to you think Big Brother is truly alive?
I think that he is alive, because of the way that he responds, it seems that he was very peculiar and evasive in the way that he answers the question. In answering this question I used a LOGOS appeal, by the way that used logic to answer the question.
4. What would be your biggest fear, that would be found in "Room 101".
My fear that would be found in this room, would be myself having to watch people die. I feel that this is something that is just absolutely chaotic and apocalyptic and I hope no one would ever have to watch this happen. In answering this question I used a PATHOS appeal.
5. With the book being broken into three parts, what is the significance of each part?
I feel that Book 1, would be the introduction the text and its characters and the story itself, while Book 2 further goes in depth to the story and shows the climax, while Book 3 shows the end result of the text and the resolution in a way. In answering this question I applied a LOGOS appeal, by the way I used logic to answer the question.
6.Why does the Party look to change the mindsets of its criminal rather than simply kill them?
As expressed by O’Brien himself, the party’s system ensures “…there are no martyrdoms.” The party wishes to completely suppress rebellion, and ensure that revolutionary thoughts die before the thoughtcriminals do. The danger of martyrdom is that it only encourages others to fight, and even die for their beliefs.
Level 3 Questions
1. How powerful can a person be against the government?
I feel that one person alone, can sometimes be extremely powerful, especially if in a result of themselves rebelling or causing some type of chaos, they can cause others to join them in their fight. In answering this question I employed a LOGOS appeal, through the way that I used logic and analysis to answer the question.
2.When is it okay to betray someone you love?
I feel that it is never acceptable to betray someone, if the person has done nothing to harm you, the thing that people are always told is, "Do to others, what you would want done to you."
In answering this question I employed a PATHOS appeal, by the way I play on emotions.
3.How strongly is human emotion influenced by other people?
Without the influence of other human beings, things like love and pain cannot exist because they are impossible to apply to someone else. Therefore, human contact is necessary for the development of emotion. In answering this question, I applied a emotional appeal by the way that I use emotion to answer the question completely.
Quotation Tracking
1. Pg : 248, "Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past, repeated Winston obediently. ”
2.Pg : 241, “The beatings grew less frequent, and became mainly a threat, a horror to which he could not be sent back at any moment when his answers were unsatisfactory.”